JULY & AUGUST – 2023
BACKGROUND:
The Authority took a very serious notice upon the complaints which were reported in NEPRA
offices from all over the Pakistan regarding excessive, inflated, and wrong bills charged by the
distribution companies to the consumers during the months i.e. July 2023 and August 2023. On such
violations of the applicable documents, the Authority decided to conduct a hearing of all distribution
companies and also invite Ministry of Energy (Power Division) to attend the said hearing. In this
regard, a hearing notice was issued vide letter dated 10.09.2023. The hearing was held on 13.09.2023
wherein CEOs of all the distribution companies participated online and expressed their point of views
before the Authority. It was noted during the course of proceedings that the numerous distribution
companies are charging meter readings, whereby snaps readings differ from the readings recorded on
the consumers’ bills. In other cases, snaps of meter reading are either invisible or deliberately not
taken. Similarly, some cases were reported that monthly meter readings are being taken beyond billing
cycle of 30 days, which resulted in undue/inflated charging of upper slab bills to the less user
consumer(s) hence, changing category from protected to un-protected.
INQUIRY COMMITTEE:
2. Consequent to the above hearing, the Authority decided to constitute a committee comprising
of following NEPRA professionals to probe into the matter of over/excessive billing issues and to
submit its report along with recommendations to the Authority for consideration within 20 (twenty)
working days:
i) Mr. Ubedullah Memon, Director (CAD), Convener
ii) Mr. Lashkar Khan Qambrani, Director (CAD), Member
iii) Hafiz Irfan Ahmed, Addl. Director (M&E), Member
iv) In-charges of all NEPRA Regional Offices, Members
PROCEEDINGS:
3. In order to start the proceedings, gather the data and to hold discussions with all the
stakeholders, the Committee conducted meetings with all the DISCO’s representatives, Power
Information Technology Company (PITC) and carried out site visits. All the Regional Offices visited
the respective DISCOs and inquired the matter in detail, whereas, IESCO was visited by the head
office committee members. After detailed deliberations, the sufficient volume of data/record has been
gathered particularly from PITC and all the relevant companies as well. The following have been
observed:-
3.1. Analysis of Domestic Consumers tariff category A-1 (a), Charged Excessive Bills:
Sr. # Name of
DISCO
Billing
Month
Reading
Period
More than
30 days
Consumers
charged
higher slab
due to
excessive
reading
period
Consumers
converted
from
Protected to
NonProtected
Consumers
whose life
line status
changed to
Non-life line
Consumers
without valid
meter reading/
snap date
1 MEPCO
July, 2023 5,725,048 2,137,973 647,155 40,668 15
August, 2023 2,265,271 230,746 32,190 3,515 138,723
2 GEPCO
July, 2023 463,360 61,439 20,526 618 57
August, 2023 1,192,062 157,202 30,510 1,211 43
3 FESCO
July, 2023 354,904 60,169 18,368 157 10
August, 2023 844,058 237,971 34,273 757 9,694
4 LESCO
July, 2023 685,588 88,321 19,336 2,020 123,440
August, 2023 650,460 69,692 10,700 1,662 126,014
5 HESCO
July, 2023 521,624 113,640 15,736 1,181 94
August, 2023 208,481 13,727 1,541 160 39,362
6 PESCO
July, 2023 156,647 9,810 4,411 238 2,875
August, 2023 156,949 11,530 3,305 272 638
7 QESCO
July, 2023 116,255 3,719 856 153 116,255
August, 2023 48,732 2,335 353 34 48,732
8 IESCO
July, 2023 17,009 6,529 1,237 42 1,848
August, 2023 28,841 2,134 363 21 68
9 SEPCO
July, 2023 485 20 1 0 485
August, 2023 325,764 5,158 542 91 325,764
10 KE
July, 2023 Nil Nil Nil Nil 77,869
(inaccurate snap)
August, 2023 Nil Nil Nil Nil 65,675
(inaccurate snap)
11 TESCO
July, 2023 – – – – –
August, 2023 – – – – –
ANALYSIS
The above table shows the different heads under which the domestic consumers were
excessively charged during the months of July, 2023 & August, 2023. It is surprisingly noted that more
than 57 lacs consumers in MEPCO were charged for more than 30 days of billing cycle in the month
of July, 2023 followed by GEPCO i.e., around 12 lacs in August, 2023. Similarly, FESCO i.e., more
than 8 lacs in August, 2023, LESCO around 7 lacs in both months and HESCO more than 5 lacs in
the month of July, 2023. This resulted in change of slab from lower to higher, change of status from
protected to un-protected and change of status from life line to non-life line for thousands of
consumers.
It is further noted with grave concern that during the months of July, 2023 & August, 2023,
thousands of consumers were served electricity bills having invalid snaps, in which MEPCO, LESCO,
QESCO and SEPCO are major contributors.
3.2. Details of the consumers who were charged reading period more than 30 days
As per the notified tariff terms and conditions, billing period means a billing month of 30 days or less
reckoned from the date of last meter reading. However, the above table illustrates the billing cycles
carried out by different DISCOs that ranges from above 30 days to 40 days and even more. It is
alarmingly noted that thousands of consumers were charged for more than 40 days billing. This was
the major cause of overbilling during the months of July, 2023 & August, 2023. In this regard,
MEPCO followed by GEPCO, FESCO, LESCO and HESCO are the DISCOs who heavily done such
overbilling. Overall, all DISCOs are responsible for such unjustified exercise.
Sr.
#
Name of
DISCO
Billing
Month Total 31 & 32
Days 33 Days 34 Days 35
Days
36
Days
37
Days
38
Days
39
Days 40 Days > 40
1 LESCO
July, 2023 685,588 373,912 206,875 85,711 15,935 3,155 – – – – –
August,
2023 650,460 500,851 127,726 17,475 4,397 11 – – – – –
2 GEPCO
July, 2023 463,360 247,986 93,494 47,549 38,408 20,501 6,915 2,350 588 484 5,085
August,
2023 1,192,062 627,444 301,918 124,155 64,812 40,145 16,737 9,964 3,002 1,931 1,954
3 FESCO
July, 2023 354,904 141,204 52,747 37,663 34,700 29,981 24,433 15,934 11,505 2,848 3,889
August,
2023 844,058 104,517 75,582 75,409 78,946 58,778 53,509 67,909 89,018 109,681 130709
4 IESCO
July, 2023 17,009 2,286 1,466 6 3,107 1,798 2,346 3,296 2 868 1,834
August,
2023 28,841 27,142 308 26 12 158 8 62 687 83 355
5 MEPCO
July, 2023 5,725,048 10676 35144 82228 12355
4
36405
6
10053
69
15006
92
11889
01 904835 509593
August,
2023 2,265,271 1181076 693647 226429 61452 25198 13,577 10639 9752 22619 20882
6 PESCO
July, 2023 156,647 67,547 39,666 22,206 11,074 7,280 5,802 2,304 662 72 34
August,
2023 156,949 71,728 39,617 18,433 8,929 5,822 4,245 4,305 2,010 1,244 616
7 HESCO
July, 2023 521,624 4,769 9,482 19,283 40,782 75,243 88,432 80,117 80,018 56,443 67,055
August,
2023 208,481 110,945 43,905 14,411 5,323 4,268 5,784 5,458 4,726 4,108 9,553
8 SEPCO
July, 2023 485 442 39 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2
August,
2023 325,764 325,759 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 1
9 QESCO
July, 2023 116,255 116,248 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
August,
2023 48,732 43,771 0 0 909 1,045 1,679 485 843 0 0
10 TESCO
July, 2023 – – – – – – – – – – –
August,
2023 – – – – – – – – – – –
11 KE
July, 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
August,
2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 10,687,614 5,104,351 2,540,452 1,091,090 512,413 318,823 236,377 213,185 208,063 213,428 249,432
Page 6 of 14
Page 7 of 14
3.3 Analysis of age wise Defective Meters in DISCOs Impacting Higher Bills:
Sr. # Name of DISCO No. of Defective Meters Aging of Defective Meters (*)
Ending
June, 2023
Ending
July, 2023
Ending
August, 2023
Total (*)
1 LESCO 70,790 93,837 102,714 75,014 02-03 months: 47,650
04-06 months: 25,810
07-12 months: 1,549
01-02 Years: 05
2 FESCO 24,540 24,221 24,188 1092 02-03 months 1086
04-06 months: 06
3 SEPCO 2,542 2,184 2,067 1829 02-03 months 203
04-06 months: 300
07-12 months: 566
01-02 Years: 449
02-03 Years: 309
Above 03 Years: 02
4 QESCO 3,052 3,296 3,117 1,806 02-03 months 1223
04-06 months: 496
07-12 months: 85
01-02 Years: 02
5 MEPCO 219,584 249,571 272,370 238229 02-03 months 77847
04-06 months: 74368
07-12 months: 86013
01-02 Years: 01
6 HESCO 12,276 11,669 10,866 10652 02-03 months 157
04-06 months: 203
07-12 months: 6642
01-02 Years: 472
02-03 Years: 2310
Above 03 Years: 868
7 TESCO 69 54 51 20 02-03 months 12
04-06 months: 08
8 PESCO 11,323 14,868 12,794 7483 02-03 months 6973
04-06 months: 417
07-12 months: 86
01-02 Years: 07
9 IESCO 18,002 30,921 35,157 22052 02-03 months 21564
04-06 months: 480
07-12 months: 08
10 GEPCO 22,267 27,862 29,154 14147 02-03 months 12289
04-06 months: 1858
11 KE 9,186 02-03 months: Awaited
04-06 months: 3,874
07-12 months: 3,963
01-02 Years: 763
02-03 Years: 376
Above 03 Years: 210
Pending DF Meters Total 384,445 458,483 492,478 381,510
02-03 months: 169,004
04-06 months: 107,820
07-12 months: 98,912
01-02 Years: 1,699
02-03 Years: 2,995
Above 03 Years: 1080
According to Clause 4.3 of Consumer Service Manual (CSM), the defective meters are
required to be replaced immediately however, in case of non-availability the meters are required to be
replaced within two billing cycles. It is evident from the above table that due to non-replacement of
defective meters thousands of consumers have been charged on average basis for more than (02)
months and even in large number of cases one (01) year to three (03) years and even above three (03)
years. The respective DISCOs did not bother to replace the defective meters even after three years.
Had these meters been replaced on time, there could have been a chance to calculate the authentic
figures of losses.
Taking a closer look, it is observed that more than 04 lac consumers were excessively charged during
the period of 02 months i.e., from June, 2023 to August, 2023 on account of applying defective code
by declaring the meters as defective. DISCOs have failed to replace defective meters or feed MCO
even after long duration ranging from (02) months to more than (03) years. DISCOs are deliberately
using such tactics for the purpose of charging electricity bill on average basis, which may lead to loss
either to consumers or to the national exchequer.
3.4 Analysis of Sample Bills Checked along with all type of Discrepancies:
Sr
.#
Description Name of DISCO
PESCO TESCO IESCO FESCO GEPCO LESCO MEPCO QESCO SEPCO HESCO KE
No % No % No % No % No % No % No % No % No % No % No %
1 Total No. of
Sample Bills
Checked
300 100 89 100 183 100 330 100 2500 100 199 100 600 100 429 100 480 100 466 100 571 100
2 Total No. of
Bills where
discrepancie
s found
292 97.3 44 50 119 65 270 82 2453 98 199 100 470 78 429 100 442 92 466 100 211 37
3 Total No. of
Bills where
difference in
reading
between
snap & bill
charged
220 73.3 0 0 05 2.7 30 9 10 0.4 31 16 11 2 35 8 42 9.5 45 9.7 20 4
4 Total No. of
Bills where
protected
status was
affected due
to overbilling
43 14.3 0 0 19 10.3 0 0 0 0 1 1 9 2 10 2 5 1.1 6 1.3 2 0
5 Total No. of
Bills where
slab of
consumer
was changed
due to
overbilling
37 12.3 0 0 12 6.5 0 0 5 0.2 0 0 4 1 1 0 5 1.1 6 1.3 11 2
6 Total No. of
bills where
defective
code was
allotted for
more than
two months
150 50 15 17 12 6.5 10 3 27 1.08 20 10 200 33 150 35 60 13.5 51 11 38 7
7 Total no. of
bills where
snap date is
not
mentioned
on bills
57 19 0 0 17 9.2 119 36 497 19.88 29 15 81 14 69 16 65 14.7 81 17.3 0 0
8 Total no. of
bills without
meter
snapshot
26 8.6 50 56 15 8.19 53 16 225 9 29 15 16 3 57 13 50 11 80 17.2 23 4
9 Total no. of
bills where
snapshot
reading not
clear
22 7.3 10 11.2 04 2.18 10 3 449 17.9 24 12 5 1 41 10 44 10 34 7.3 3 1
10 Total no. of
bills where
detection
was charged
without
following
CSM
procedure
21 7 15 17 09 4.9 62 62 27 1.08 14 7 2 0 0 0 70 15.9 29 6.2 21 2
11 Total no. of
bills where
difference in
dates
between
snap &
schedule
date
85 28.3 39 44 14 7.6 115 34 2500 100 199 100 25 4 206 48 70 15.9 120 25.8 12 2
12 Total no. of
bills where
meter no. is
not clear
240 80 0 0 70 38.2 306 93 2453 98.12 0 0 117 20 348 81 27 6.1 9 1.93 91 16
13 Total no. of
bills where
meter no. is
mismatched
0 0 0 0 03 1.6 1 0.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 5 1.1 0
14 Total no. of
bills that
were
corrected in
all aspects
8 2.7 45 50 64 35 60 18 0 0 0 0 130 22 0 0 4 4 0 0 350
Page 10 of 14
According to Clause 6.1.1 of Consumer Service Manual (CSM), meter reading of all
consumers are required to be carried out on routine basis each month to record the consumption of
electricity. Clause 6.1.3 of CSM makes it mandatory for meter readers to take snapshots of meter
readings through mobile/ hand held units. The Clause 6.2 of CSM envisages a procedure for carrying
out percentage check for charging actual consumption to the consumers.
This set of data is based on the random sampling and subsequent field verification carried out
by the NEPRA Regional Offices located in every DISCO. Above table indicates a terrible picture
pertaining to the metering and billing mechanism being done by all the DISCOs. The above table
depicts that a large number of bills have multiple discrepancies. Based on the above sampling, there
are huge number of discrepancies such as invalid snap, snap without meter date or reading, bill without
snap, mismatch between snap & bill, mismatch between readings of bill & snaps, late posting of MCO
or SCO and double units charging during the defective meter period average plus based on the load
etc. All this heavily impacts in form of change of status from protected to unprotected, from lower
slab to higher slab and from life line to non-life line etc. There is no any single DISCO in the country
who is charging bills in 100% correct manner which is serious matter of concern at present. Further,
in TESCO, there are no registered residential consumers. TESCO has submitted that their domestic
consumers are subsidized by the Govt. of Pakistan, therefore, TESCO submitted that no such record
exists in TESCO.
4. DETECTION BILLING
4.1. Clauses 9.1 and 9.2 of CSM provide a procedure for charging detection bills. It has been
observed that the detection bills charged by DISCOs are fake and frivolous due to which recovery
ratio is very less in some DISCOs. It is further observed that some amount has also been returned/
credited to the consumers by DISCOs meaning thereby that the detection bills were wrongly charged.
The situation is alarming in HESCO and SEPCO having recovery ratio of 5% & 6% respectively;
whereas, the recovery ratio of detection bills in IESCO, GEPCO & FESCO is much better in average
of 94%, 95%& 98% respectively. The recovery ratio in MEPCO, LESCO and QESCO are 85%, 70%
& 69% respectively. The recovery ratio of detection bills in TESCO and PESCO is about 22%. KE
has not submitted the detail of recovery made against detection bills. KE is of the view that the
detection bills are charged during a certain point in time, whereas the payments of not only detection
bills but arrears, if any, against monthly electricity bills are usually made by the consumers in
installments over a prolonged time period which are posted collectively in respective consumer
accounts. Therefore, collections against detection bills cannot be separately mapped to provide
specific recovery amount against detection bills. It has been observed that the detection bills have
been charged in violation of provisions of CSM. Had the detection bills been correctly charged, there
would have a chance of more recovery.
4.2. It is relevant to state that recovery ratio is becoming less due to charging of wrong detection
bills. The good paying consumers do not pay their regular bills due to inclusion of wrong detection
bills. This results in increase of AT&C losses of feeder and consequently the number of load shedding
hours are increased, which leads to more number of switching operations, thus causing deterioration
of switchgears panels. The only purpose of charging detection is to show the improvement in losses
up to books level, however, actually it is not so. On the other hand, system is completely damaged and
good paying consumers are badly suffering.
Page 11 of 14
4.1. Analysis of Recovery Ratio for Detection Bills:
Sr. # Name of DISCO Recovery Ratio for Every 100 Detection Bills Charged by Respective DISCOs
1 MEPCO 85%
2 GEPCO 95%
3 FESCO 98%
3 LESCO 70%
4 HESCO 05%
6 PESCO 22%
7 QESCO 69%
8 IESCO 94%
9 SEPCO 06%
10 KE Not Provided
11 TESCO 22%
5 Comparison between Hand Held Units and Snaps through Mobile:
5.1. The CSM provides that it is mandatory for meter readers to take snapshots of meter readings
through mobile sets / handheld units. During inquiry, it came to the knowledge that DISCOs
except KEL are carrying out meter reading through Mobile Phone instead of Handheld Units
(HHU).
Page 12 of 14
5.2. Handheld units designed for meter reading often have specialized features for this task. They
offer better control, accuracy and ease of use. Handheld units are typically built to withstand
harsh environmental conditions which is important when taking photos of outdoor or hardto-reach meters. Hand held units have longer battery life compared to smartphones ensuring
they remain operational during extended meter reading sessions. Some handheld units can
directly integrate with data management systems making it easier to transfer and store meter
reading data.
5.3. Moreover, handheld units are typically designed with security measures to prevent tampering
with date and time stamps. This can help to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the meter
reading data. Handheld units may provide an audit trail of actions taken including when and
where each reading was recorded. This can make it more challenging for meter readers to
falsify data without detection.
5.4. On the other hand, DISCOs have pleaded that most of the reading staff have a mobile phone,
so there is no additional cost for the device itself. Modern smartphones come equipped with
high-resolution cameras that can capture detailed images of electricity meters. Mobile phones
are easy to carry and are used for other apps or making calls. Smartphones often have built-in
GPS, allowing to record the exact location where the photo was taken which can be useful for
tracking meter locations. However, there are a number of disadvantages for using smart
phones such as taking photos and using a smartphone for other tasks can drain the battery
quickly which may not be ideal for extended meter reading sessions. Mobile phones are
generally less rugged than dedicated handheld units and may not withstand harsh
environmental conditions as well. Smartphones can be distracting, during the meter reading
process.
5.5. Moreover, mobile phones being multipurpose devices are susceptible to tampering with date
and time settings. Some users may change these settings intentionally. Mobile phones may not
provide the same level of detail and audit trail for meter reading activities. Employers may
have less control and oversight over meter readers.
5.6. The Handheld units are more reliable for taking meter readings, however, the only
disadvantage is that these units are expensive as compared to smartphones.
6. FINDINGS:
6.1. It is very unfortunate that distribution companies are deliberately carrying out such
malpractices in order to hide their inefficiencies due to which thousands of consumers
suffered with higher electricity bills. Overall, it can be said that most of the DISCOs have
failed to charge the electricity bills in accordance with the relevant clauses of CSM i.e. 4.3,
6.1.1, 6.1.3 & 6.2 and terms & conditions of tariff approved by the Authority. The DISCOs
have also failed to carry out the mechanism of percentage checking as provided in CSM.
Moreover, detection bills have been charged in violation of clause 9.1 and 9.2 of CSM.
6.2. It is relevant to state that consumer(s) particularly domestic and less electricity users suffered
a lot due to such overbilling and compelled to not pay the bill. This ultimately affect the
recovery of DISCOs and increase in AT&C losses and subsequently load shedding.
6.3. The DISCOs are responsible for over charging of bills to the consumers and have been found
involved in such illegal practices due to failure to abide by the relevant provisions of the
Page 13 of 14
applicable documents. The DISCOs have also charged detection bills to hundreds of
thousands of consumers in violation of the provisions of Consumer Service Manual.
6.4. TESCO has submitted that all the domestic consumers (A-1) are subsidized from the day one
in TESCO by the Govt. of Pakistan therefore, there are no registered domestic consumers in
TESCO.
7. CONCLUSIONS:
Foregoing in view, it is concluded that Distribution Companies are charging excessive
bills/detection bills to the consumers by adopting illegal & unlawful practices, therefore, prima
facie, are in violation of NEPRA Act, Consumer Service Manual, Terms & Conditions of
Tariff and other applicable documents, etc.
8. RECOMMENDATIONS:
Keeping the above in view, the following is recommended and determined by the Authority.
8.1 Legal proceedings against all Distribution Companies including KEL under NEPRA Fine
Regulations, 2021 for violation of the provisions of NEPRA Act, CSM and tariff terms &
conditions etc.
8.2 DISCOs may be directed to replace all defective meters immediately having age above two
(02) months and to submit the compliance report within two (02) months. Data of such meters
be retrieved and the consumers be charged actual reading instead of average billing.
8.3 The DISCOs may be directed to coordinate with Power Information Technology Company
(PITC) and review all the inflated charged bills since June 2023 and onwards which caused
conversion of category of billing from protected /life line consumers into unprotected/nonlife line consumers due to billing cycle above 30 days, excessive billing; whatsoever by
collecting account No. wise details from PITC.
8.4 DISCOs may be directed to obtain the required data / details from PITC as per Table 3.1, 3.2
and 3.3 for the purpose of revision of inflated bills on pro-rata basis. DISCOs shall correct
the bills within one billing cycle and issue revised bills to the affected consumers without
compromising on their status of protected/ life line consumer as the case may be, and submit
compliance report within thirty (30) days.
8.5 The DISCOs may be directed to initiate proceedings against concerned officials for violation
of provisions of Consumer Service Manual and other applicable documents as per their
service rules on account of carrying out such illegal practices and submit compliance report
within thirty (30) days.
8.6 The DISCOs may be directed to procure Handheld Units (HHU) for carrying out meter
readings in more transparent manner.
8.7 HESCO, SEPCO, PESCO & TESCO may be directed to circle wise scrutinize each unrecovered detection bills charged during July 2018 to June 2023 to validate their authenticity
and ensure recovery of the same. In case it is proved that detection bill was charged wrongly,
the revenue as well as the billed units be reversed and the amount appearing as receivables be
adjusted accordingly. Action may be taken against the relevant SDO and XEN for violation
of provisions of CSM in charging detection bills and submit the compliance report within
thirty (30) days. MEPCO, QESCO and LESCO may be directed to immediately recover the
unpaid detection bills charged during July 2018 to June 2023.
Page 14 of 14
8.8 The DISCOs may be directed to follow the provisions of Consumer Service Manual in true
letter and spirit in meter readings, percentage checking to ensure accuracy of meter readings,
issuance of detection bills and replacement of defective meters. Moreover, the DISCOs be
directed to educate their officers/ officials about NEPRA Act, tariff terms & conditions,
CSM, Consumer Eligibility Criteria etc.
Comments are closed.